Re: System lockup with processes in D state in 2.6.16.1

[Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>]

Thanks Rob.  If Chris does not resolve this for you, please ping me,
otherwise I will assume that as the persons most familiar he or Oleg
will be the best ones to resolve it.

Hans

Robert Mueller wrote:

> Some time ago, we were seeing a problem in the kernel in the reiserfs
> code where a lock inversion issue could cause processes to get stuck
> in D state, requiring a system reboot.
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=108932517300001&r=1&w=2
>
> This link describes the actual call path that causes the problem.
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109035413201491&w=2
>
> At the time, the solution we got was to add a patch the basically
> bypasses reiser_file_write and just calls generic_file_write. This
> semed to fix the problem and we've been running for over a year fine
> with that patch.
>
> Recent we brought the issue up again with some reiser people, who
> mentioned that:
>
>> There was a patch for the problem referenced by this link. (By Cris
>> Mason,
>> I think). This patch is long included into vanilla kernel
>> (2.6.15 certainly contains it). If you still see deadlocks, I guess
>> you need
>> to gather some more info again (sysrq-t and friends).
>
>
> So we recently built 2.6.16.1, without the patch. However after just 1
> hour of stress testing with cyrus again, we were able to lock up the
> system with lots of processes stuck in D state and a load running to
> 500+. The machine had about 1500 processes running on it, and the
> dmesg buffer was only 1M, so it seems we weren't able to capture all
> the traces with a sysrq-t, but there's still a lot of info. I've put
> the sysrq-t and kernel config output at the links below:
>
> http://kernel.robm.fastmail.fm/sysrq-t-2006-03-30-1.txt
> http://kernel.robm.fastmail.fm/kernel-config-2006-03-30-1.txt
>
> Any idea if this is related to the previous problem or is something
> different?
>
> Rob
>
>
>
>