From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
	k33Dfcvc027736
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:41:38 -0400
Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com
	[81.103.221.48])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
	k33DfXFT008947
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:41:34 -0400
Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35])
	by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id
	<20060403134123.EBNA29040.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 14:41:23 +0100
Received: from [192.168.11.10] (really [62.253.210.226])
	by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id
	<20060403134123.LZEJ16286.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.11.10]>
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 14:41:23 +0100
Message-ID: <443125FE.9020501@watford53.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 14:41:18 +0100
From: Jim Ford <jaford@watford53.freeserve.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM NOT scary!
References: <443115F0.8030503@watford53.freeserve.co.uk>	<20060403124112.GP19029@fencepost>
	<20060403124601.GR1259@lug-owl.de>
In-Reply-To: <20060403124601.GR1259@lug-owl.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Id: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>

Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:

> Full ACK. The most scary cases are those where people expect to get
>
>high-availability by LVM'ing some IDE disks together.
>
>Hey, LVM on MD really is a nice thing, even dm-crypt ontop, works
>flawlessly :)
>  
>
What, you mean Mini Disk - the little magneto optical disks used for 
personal audio players? What's the advantage in that, aren't they only 
about a 1 gig storage?

Jim Ford