From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Eric Leblond <eric@inl.fr>
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
nufw-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [RFC] fixed duration connection
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:57:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4433CCBF.6060103@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1144139619.5186.24.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Eric Leblond wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While working on NuFW development branch, we have had to
> implement policy just as :
> * connection to server is authorised from 08h to 18h and
> connection must be switched off at 18h.
>
> Such features are frequently asked by customers or netfilter addicts but
> even with current conntrack related code, it can not be done cleanly.
>
> Thus, we've added the notion of fixed duration before expiration to
> connection in the conntrack. (See extended information on bottom for
> details)
>
> The following set of patches is against kernel (linus git tree),
> libnetfilter_conntrack, and conntrack tool.
>
> -- Extended --
>
> When trying to implement this feature with current connection tracking
> code, we have faced some issues :
> 1. userspace code has to duplicate conntrack entries, thus it's
> complex and uses memory
> 2. there is no hope to have it done by a simple command line
> (because of 1.)
> 3. if replication of conntrack in userspace is needed there will be
> many synchronisation problems : stop and start of an
> hypothetical "expiration" daemon would cause conntrack
> duplication and/or loss of information ...
>
> For this reason, we've worked on a simple kernel level implementation.
> This is done via a second "struct timer" that is added in connection
> structure. Activation of the timer, is for now done via userspace by
> using libnetfilter_conntrack or by using new option -T of the conntrack
> tool.
If I understand you correctly, a fixed timeout is just a timeout that
isn't refreshed, right? Why can't we just use the regular timers etc.
and add a flag that it should not be touched by ip_ct_refresh? This
would also eliminate the need for any ctnetlink changes since the
timeout value can already be specified.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-05 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-04 8:33 [PATCH 0/3] [RFC] fixed duration connection Eric Leblond
2006-04-04 8:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Eric Leblond
2006-04-04 8:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] " Eric Leblond
2006-04-04 8:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] [RFC] " Eric Leblond
2006-04-04 8:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] " Eric Leblond
2006-04-04 8:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] [RFC] " Eric Leblond
2006-04-05 13:57 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2006-04-05 14:41 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Eric Leblond
2006-04-07 21:53 ` Eric Leblond
2006-04-07 21:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] [kernel patch] " Eric Leblond
2006-04-08 19:56 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-08 20:55 ` Eric Leblond
2006-04-11 16:22 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-11 20:20 ` Eric Leblond
2006-04-12 8:38 ` Harald Welte
2006-04-12 10:48 ` Harald Welte
2006-04-12 19:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-13 16:17 ` Eric Leblond
2006-04-21 2:30 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-21 20:53 ` Eric Leblond
2006-04-22 0:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-07 21:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] [libnetfilter_conntrack] " Eric Leblond
2006-04-08 19:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-08 20:23 ` Eric Leblond
2006-04-07 22:01 ` [PATCH 0/3] [conntrack] " Eric Leblond
2006-04-07 22:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] " Eric Leblond
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4433CCBF.6060103@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=eric@inl.fr \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=nufw-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.