From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4433DC01.6060104@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:02:25 -0400 From: Randy Smith MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Questions porting existing rtai-24.1.12 app to xenomai (PART II) References: <1CFEB358338412458B21FAA0D78FE86D042A2FEE@rennsmail02.eu.thmulti.com> <44328187.6080005@domain.hid> <44327F66.10800@domain.hid> <44329186.3080908@domain.hid> <44329D27.1000400@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <44329D27.1000400@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Philippe Gerum wrote: > > Ok, just to be 100% sure, I've just tried the following on a stock > 2.1.0 grabbed from the mirror: > > ../somewhere/xenomai-2.1.0/configure --build=i686-linux > --host=ppc-linux --prefix=$HOME/xenomai-install CC=ppc_82xx-gcc > CXX=ppc_82xx-gcc AR=ppc_82xx-ar LD=ppc_82xx-ld > > The resulting tree builds and install fine under $HOME/xenomai-install > afterwards. There is no kernel dependency whatsoever since the > user-space support does not even know about the kernel version which > is going to be used in the first place, so we should be able to get > the same user-space setup. Could you try rebuilding in a clean build > tree using equivalent switches at config time, and let me know of the > outcome? TIA, > Philippe, Thanks for your patient help. I did what you asked and it works fine for the user side. The kernel side is what is screwed up. I am using the ELDK 3.1 from the DENX CD and when I try applying the Adeos patch, it fails in several places. I ended up applying the patch by hand and I only had a few places where I was scratching my head as to where to apply the changes so that might be what I screwed up. Is the xenomai-2.1.0/ksrc/arch/powerpc/patches/adeos-ipipe-2.4.25-ppc-denx-1.0-03.patch supposed to apply to the develop tree for ELDK 3.1 instead?? I couldn't make heads or tails of the numbering scheme used on the patch wrt the "denx-1.0-03" part. I'm so close...and I really want to figure this out. -Randy