From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Subject: Re: The future of patch-o-matic-ng Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:14:38 +0200 Message-ID: <4435143E.3030700@gmx.net> References: <20060405152628.GI20558@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <20060406073514.GE6887@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <4434CFBF.7030208@trash.net> <20060406105350.GT6887@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist , Patrick McHardy , Grzegorz Janoszka Return-path: To: Harald Welte In-Reply-To: <20060406105350.GT6887@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Harald Welte schrieb: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 12:34:21PM +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: > >>So, this external repository will be used only by netfilter server to >>download patchlets? People will be still able to download complete >>pom-ng package? > > No, users will actually only download And exactly that's the problem with the proposed change. The value of pom-ng was not a central list of patches (I can always get that from the netfilter web site), but the packaged collection. So if you really don't want to package patches from other sources anymore, please be honest and call the new package pom-coreteam or something like that. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/