From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: The future of patch-o-matic-ng Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 16:23:36 +0200 Message-ID: <44352468.5010505@trash.net> References: <20060405152628.GI20558@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <20060406073514.GE6887@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <4434CFBF.7030208@trash.net> <20060406105350.GT6887@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <4435143E.3030700@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Harald Welte , Netfilter Development Mailinglist , Grzegorz Janoszka Return-path: To: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger In-Reply-To: <4435143E.3030700@gmx.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Harald Welte schrieb: > >>On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 12:34:21PM +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: >> >> >>>So, this external repository will be used only by netfilter server to >>>download patchlets? People will be still able to download complete >>>pom-ng package? >> >>No, users will actually only download > > > And exactly that's the problem with the proposed change. The value > of pom-ng was not a central list of patches (I can always get that > from the netfilter web site), but the packaged collection. You can always do "runme --download" and you have the packaged collection. We could also start doing two releases, one with only patches maintained by the netfilter team and one with all the patches. > So if you really don't want to package patches from other sources > anymore, please be honest and call the new package pom-coreteam > or something like that. Whats the point? We _do_ include other patches, just not every random crap.