From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: The future of patch-o-matic-ng Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 16:31:57 +0200 Message-ID: <4435265D.4080603@trash.net> References: <20060405152628.GI20558@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <20060406073514.GE6887@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Harald Welte , Netfilter Development Mailinglist Return-path: To: Grzegorz Janoszka In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Grzegorz Janoszka wrote: > On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Harald Welte wrote: > >> As indicated in Patricks mail, there's a 30 day grace period. Until >> then the original authors (if they care) or other people can take >> maintenance for individual patchlets and send us URL's to those >> repositories. We will add them to our list file, and distribute a >> 'runme' script which downloads those repositories off the net. >> If you want to help, I suggest to wait for those patchlets that nobody >> takes care of, and run a repository for them. > > > I want to maintain my target IPMARK. A can take care of some other > targets. At this moment I use IPMARK, nth, random and connlimit. The > esiest for me would be to take care of a target/match I know and I use. Thanks, I've updated my list for IPMARK. nth and random will be merged, so this just leaves connlimit. Shall I add you for this as well?