* [PATCH 0/2] scsi tgt updates (replace the elevator code)
@ 2006-03-16 0:04 FUJITA Tomonori
2006-04-07 2:13 ` Mike Christie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: FUJITA Tomonori @ 2006-03-16 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James.Bottomley; +Cc: linux-scsi
Here's another patchset to synchronize the scsi-target git tree with
the latest code in the subversion repository. This patchset replaces
the elevator code with a simple list.
This patchset assumes that the previous patchset is applied.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=114199144502121&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] scsi tgt updates (replace the elevator code)
2006-03-16 0:04 [PATCH 0/2] scsi tgt updates (replace the elevator code) FUJITA Tomonori
@ 2006-04-07 2:13 ` Mike Christie
2006-04-07 12:20 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Christie @ 2006-04-07 2:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: FUJITA Tomonori; +Cc: James.Bottomley, linux-scsi
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> Here's another patchset to synchronize the scsi-target git tree with
> the latest code in the subversion repository. This patchset replaces
> the elevator code with a simple list.
>
> This patchset assumes that the previous patchset is applied.
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=114199144502121&w=2
> -
Hey James the patchset referred to in this mail, this patchset and the
"[PATCH] scsi tgt: add task management function support" patch did not
get merged to the tgt merged. Did you want us to resend the patchsets or
did you not like them, or do you wnat them in one nice large patchset?
Or did you want us to ask Jens to merge some of the not so controversial
block layer stuff like "[PATCH 4/6] block layer: use blk_rq_bio_prep in
init_request_from_bio" first? Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] scsi tgt updates (replace the elevator code)
2006-04-07 2:13 ` Mike Christie
@ 2006-04-07 12:20 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2006-04-07 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Christie; +Cc: FUJITA Tomonori, linux-scsi
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 21:13 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> Hey James the patchset referred to in this mail, this patchset and the
> "[PATCH] scsi tgt: add task management function support" patch did not
> get merged to the tgt merged. Did you want us to resend the patchsets or
> did you not like them, or do you wnat them in one nice large patchset?
> Or did you want us to ask Jens to merge some of the not so controversial
> block layer stuff like "[PATCH 4/6] block layer: use blk_rq_bio_prep in
> init_request_from_bio" first? Thanks.
Yes, just resend them to linux-scsi, thanks. I'm going to be away for a
few days, so I'll probably get around to merging them on Wednesday or
so.
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-07 12:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-16 0:04 [PATCH 0/2] scsi tgt updates (replace the elevator code) FUJITA Tomonori
2006-04-07 2:13 ` Mike Christie
2006-04-07 12:20 ` James Bottomley
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.