From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964991AbWDHBz3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2006 21:55:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964995AbWDHBz3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2006 21:55:29 -0400 Received: from omta05sl.mx.bigpond.com ([144.140.93.195]:4450 "EHLO omta05sl.mx.bigpond.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964991AbWDHBz3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2006 21:55:29 -0400 Message-ID: <4437180E.2090006@bigpond.net.au> Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 11:55:26 +1000 From: Peter Williams User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060313) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Possible problem in activate_task() with priority inheritance in 2.6.17-rc1-mm1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at omta05sl.mx.bigpond.com from [147.10.133.38] using ID pwil3058@bigpond.net.au at Sat, 8 Apr 2006 01:55:26 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In activate_task() the call to recalc_task_prio() is guarded by !rt_task(). This will suppress the recalculation of normal_prio for non RT tasks that just happen to be at real time priority as a result of priority inheritance. Is that intentional? Peter -- Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au "Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." -- Ambrose Bierce