From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrew@donehue.net (Andrew) Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 10:01:43 +0000 Subject: [lm-sensors] i2c-i801 and i2c-i810 can't see 82845G Message-Id: <4438DB87.2080803@donehue.net> List-Id: References: <44389EC6.4060402@donehue.net> In-Reply-To: <44389EC6.4060402@donehue.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Hi Jean, Sorry for the HTML - normally Mozilla prompts me (and I use text), if this comes through as HTML - let me know and i'll double check my settings. I am happy to test any modules if they get written before I can look at it. I have about 40 more servers to install lm-sensors on with most of them varying in hardware spec, so i'll let you know if I have any other hardware that could be used in testing. Ironically, the next server I installed sensors on had a IT8712F chipset... (which has fan and temp, and works well with the it87 module). Cheers, Andrew. Jean Delvare wrote: >Andrew, > >No HTML mail to the list please... > > > >>Thank you for the speedy reply (and detailed explanation). Considering >>that the chipset doesn't have temp or voltage sensors, I wouldn't >>consider a module for this chip as very useful to me (so please feel >>free to remove the request you have put in - I don't want anyone >>wasting their time on my behalf). >> >> > >It's still useful for us to have pointers to potential testers if a >driver is ever written, so I think I'll leave the reference to your >post. The number of requests is also a good hint of how popular a chip >is, even if you are not particularly interested in a driver. > > > >>If I can get my C skills up in the future, I might have a crack at >>writing it myself. >> >> > >Sure, why not. If you do, please let us know so that we avoid >duplicating the effort. > > >