Status of 3.0.2?

Status of 3.0.2?

[Anthony Liguori]

Hi Ian,

I'm fine with a release date of "when it's ready" but I'm a bit confused 
with the status of 3.0.2.  Has it been released already?  There are 
tarballs labeled 3.0.2 on the Cambridge site and there was a 
3_0_2_release tag applied a bit ago.  There's also a fair bit of churn 
in both trees that seems to suggest we may be passed the 3.0.2 freeze.

I'd greatly appreciate if you could clarify where we're at in the 
release process.

Thanks!

Anthony Liguori

RE: Status of 3.0.2?

[Ian Pratt]

> I'm fine with a release date of "when it's ready" but I'm a 
> bit confused with the status of 3.0.2.  Has it been released 
> already?  There are tarballs labeled 3.0.2 on the Cambridge 
> site and there was a 3_0_2_release tag applied a bit ago.  
> There's also a fair bit of churn in both trees that seems to 
> suggest we may be passed the 3.0.2 freeze.
> 
> I'd greatly appreciate if you could clarify where we're at in 
> the release process.

I'm afraid there have been delays building the various RPMs (not for any
technical reasons, but due to a flu outbreak). Since more people use the
RPMs rather than the source or binary install tar balls, it seemed daft
to announce the release on the mailing lists and update the web pages.
The 3.0.2 src and tar balls are up at the usual places for anyone that
wants to grab them. We hope to get 3.0.2-1 RPMs up in he next 24h and
officially announce the release.

Ian

Re: Status of 3.0.2?

[Anthony Liguori]

Ian Pratt wrote:
>> I'm fine with a release date of "when it's ready" but I'm a 
>> bit confused with the status of 3.0.2.  Has it been released 
>> already?  There are tarballs labeled 3.0.2 on the Cambridge 
>> site and there was a 3_0_2_release tag applied a bit ago.  
>> There's also a fair bit of churn in both trees that seems to 
>> suggest we may be passed the 3.0.2 freeze.
>>
>> I'd greatly appreciate if you could clarify where we're at in 
>> the release process.
>>     
>
> I'm afraid there have been delays building the various RPMs (not for any
> technical reasons, but due to a flu outbreak). Since more people use the
> RPMs rather than the source or binary install tar balls, it seemed daft
> to announce the release on the mailing lists and update the web pages.
> The 3.0.2 src and tar balls are up at the usual places for anyone that
> wants to grab them. We hope to get 3.0.2-1 RPMs up in he next 24h and
> officially announce the release.
>   

Thanks for the explanation!

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Ian
>   

Re: Re: Status of 3.0.2?

[Itamar Reis Peixoto]

about RPMs, if you have time please add a version of xen  RPMs for FC5 
(fedora 5)

:-)

thanks
Itamar

>>
>> I'm afraid there have been delays building the various RPMs (not for any
>> technical reasons, but due to a flu outbreak). Since more people use the
>> RPMs rather than the source or binary install tar balls, it seemed daft
>> to announce the release on the mailing lists and update the web pages.
>> The 3.0.2 src and tar balls are up at the usual places for anyone that
>> wants to grab them. We hope to get 3.0.2-1 RPMs up in he next 24h and
>> officially announce the release.
>>
>
> Thanks for the explanation!
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
>> Ian