From: Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HFSC and default qdisc backlog
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:04:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <443D1701.4070404@dsl.pipex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <033e01c64d41$fd1ae8d0$1414a8c0@provsol.int>
James Nelson wrote:
> Thanks for all of your help Patrick!
>
> Just so I'm clear. If hfsc at the class level shows no overlimits and no
> packet dropps, then hfsc is not effecting my traffic any different (from a
> throughput perspective computational computer slowness aside) then if i had
> no traffic shapping in place?
Noting what Patrick says as a caveat. But if you set up a rt class in
hfsc at the moment (it may change soon) you can sort of get a feel for
what's gone on historically by looking at the requeue counters (can't
remember if tc -s class ls will do or tc -s qdisc ls with child queues
on the class is needed).
If you have a rt class you probably don't want it to ever be backlogged
- it won't be very rt anymore (OK you could have short queue & drop).
If a rt class has become backlogged in the past then you will see
requeues - it may not be perfect, but I would say big number = bad, 0 =
good.
Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-12 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-21 23:48 [LARTC] HFSC and default qdisc backlog James Nelson
2006-03-22 0:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-03-23 0:13 ` James Nelson
2006-03-23 0:27 ` Jason Boxman
2006-03-23 4:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-12 15:04 ` Andy Furniss [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=443D1701.4070404@dsl.pipex.com \
--to=andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.