From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: nth, random and fuzzy match Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 20:57:49 +0200 Message-ID: <443D4DAD.4040908@trash.net> References: <4435559A.60904@trash.net> <20060412084719.GP31616@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist Return-path: To: Harald Welte In-Reply-To: <20060412084719.GP31616@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Harald Welte wrote: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 07:53:30PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>So my questions to the nth users: is anyone using the nth >>match in a way that can't be done by just matching on every >>nth packet with an optional starting point? > > > I suggest posting this to the users mailinglist, since the question is > addressed to users :) I already decided for myself, the functionality is not affected by removing the shared counters, it just needs to be used slightly different in some cases.