Re: [Qemu-devel] Emulation differences, qemu-system-x86_64 vs Athlon64

[Fabrice Bellard <fabrice@bellard.org>]

Julian Seward wrote:
> Recently I've been playing with CVS qemu-system (softmmu) on amd64
> and had some stability problems.  I decided to run Valgrind's amd64
> instruction-set tests (derived from qemu's) to see if they picked up
> anything.  Resulting diffs are attached.
> 
> There are a bunch of differences for the C flag for rotates
> (rol/ror) by multiples of the word size.  I don't think these
> are significant, but who knows.

This is a bug in QEMU. From the manuals, the C flag must be updated even 
if the resulting shift is zero. I just modified the QEMU tests to catch 
this problem (it is not x86_64 specific).

> Perhaps more worryingly are the 20 or so lines at the bottom
> of the diff.  These I believe are for double-to-int/short
> conversions for a value which is out of range for an int/short;
> the hardware produces 0x80000000/0x8000 respectively, which is
> the "integer indefinite"; QEMU produces zero.  I can imagine some
> obscure routine somewhere checking for integer indefinite after
> conversion and being confused as a result.

I guess the problem comes from the usage of lrintl() on x86_64 in 
fpu/softfloat-native.c, but I cannot test it yet.

Fabrice.