All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>
To: "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com>
Cc: K P <kplkml@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: JVM performance on Linux (vs. Solaris/Windows)
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 13:39:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <443EB70B.3080908@mbligh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <443EBC1D.1000307@wolfmountaingroup.com>


> Note they ran the benchmark on an Opteron 285 instead of a Xeon with 
> 16 GB of memory.    Opteron peformance currently **SUCKS** with 2.6 
> series kernels under any kind of heavy I/O due to their cloning of the 
> ancient 82489DX architecture for I/O interrupt access and 
> performance.  Looks like the test was stakced against Linux from the 
> start.  Should have used a Xeon system.
> AMD needs to get their crappy I/O performance up to snuff.  Looking at 
> the test parameteres leads me to believe there was a lot of swapping 
> on a system with already poor I/O performance.
>

Looks to me like it was the same h/w for Linux as Solaris, so I don't
think that's much of an excuse ;-)

M.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-04-13 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-13 14:53 JVM performance on Linux (vs. Solaris/Windows) K P
2006-04-13 15:56 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-04-13 18:21   ` Jan Knutar
2006-04-13 18:54     ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-13 20:23   ` David S. Miller
2006-04-13 21:01   ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-04-13 19:22     ` David Lang
2006-04-13 23:50       ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-04-13 20:39     ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2006-04-13 21:10       ` K P
2006-04-13 23:04         ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-14 22:36 ` Bogus Benchmark (was Re: JVM performance on Linux (vs. Solaris/Windows)) Linda Walsh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=443EB70B.3080908@mbligh.org \
    --to=mbligh@mbligh.org \
    --cc=jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com \
    --cc=kplkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.