All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shashikant Mundlik" <shashikant.mundlik@gmail.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [LARTC] Problems in Dead Gateway Detection / Failover
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:52:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4443b700.67aae59b.0211.45dc@mx.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43D8CEAE.3010006@tuxspace.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4978 bytes --]

Thanks a lot Ren!
That will be a great help. 
 
Thanks,
 

Shashikant Mundlik 

 



  _____  

From: Alessandro Ren [mailto:alessandro.ren@opservices.com.br] 
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 8:47 PM
To: smundlik@ubicsindia.com
Cc: manish@tuxspace.com; lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Problems in Dead Gateway Detection / Failover -
MultipleISP Links




    I bind to the interface IP and connect to 20 different sites or more,
the sites are listed in a text file, using the TCP connect in perl.
    Off course, the ip rule tables the the marks in the firewall must be set
correcly so you know that the connections are going through the right
interface.
    I can share de script, it's a litle complex in its structus, as it
depends on some external scripts, but I will try the share and problably get
more and better ideas to do the fail over / multi path routing.
    I will prepare and sent a email with it shortly.

    []s.

Shashikant Mundlik wrote: 

Hi Ren,
 
Thanks for your help. But how do you check that you reach less than 20 of
your sites. (do you mean 20 websites?).
Will you able to share the script? 
That will be great help. 
 
Thanks and regards,
 

Shashikant Mundlik 



System Administrator

UBICS, Pune                                        
Phone:  91 20 2729 1004  x 138  
Mobile : 91 9372 044015 





www.ubics.com <blocked::http://www.ubics.com/> 

The UB Group

DISCLAIMER AND PRIVILEGE NOTICE:
This e-mail message contains confidential, copyright, proprietary and
legally privileged information. It should not be used by anyone who is not
the original intended recipient. If you have erroneously received this
message, please delete it immediately and notify the sender. The recipient
must note and understand that any views expressed in this message are those
of the individual sender and no binding nature of the message shall be
implied or assumed unless the sender does so expressly with due authority of
UBICS, Inc.



 

  _____  

From: Alessandro Ren [mailto:alessandro.ren@opservices.com.br] 
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 7:31 PM
To: smundlik@ubicsindia.com
Cc: manish@tuxspace.com; lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Problems in Dead Gateway Detection / Failover -
MultipleISP Links



    I have a script that connects to 20 diferent sites on the port 80 coming
from each link interface a have on my linux router.
    If I reach less than 20% of my sites, I assume the link is down and do
all the routing and firewall adjustments to make the traffic goes to other
routes, removing the problematic link out, setting ip rules, routes in
tables and the main multipath default route and commenting in the firewall
the MARKs the would go via the link thats down and it also sets QoS and
tries to bring the link that is down back UP.
    Althought I've tested with only 3 links, it supports any number of them.
    It's works very nice so far.

    []s.


Shashikant Mundlik wrote: 

Hi There,
 
I am also trying to do the same for my network. 
I have two links from different ISPs and I want to configure a failover and
load balancing Linux router.
 
I am facing same problem here, that how to detect link failure and let Linux
box switch the gateway.
 
I know it works when the first gateway is physically down and not reachable.
But what to do if my link is up but there is problem at nexthop level and
its not routing packets to destination. 
 
Please tell me if this can be overcome by setting multipath routing. 
 
Another way I can think of doing this is to use a script which will check if
the default route is alive every 15 mins and if not it will make changes in
routing table and route the packets through different link.
 
I don't know if this is the best way to do this. If any one know how to do
this better please share. 
 
If you guys thinks this can work, lets help each other to write such scrip.
 
I am new to LARTC and just now started learning it to solve my network
problems.
 
Please help me to achieve this.
 
Thanks in advance.
 
Regards,
 

Shashikant Mundlik 



Pune, India.



  _____  


_______________________________________________

LARTC mailing list

LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

  


-- 
__________________________________________________

Alessandro Ren
	OpServices
Luciana de Abreu, 471 - Sala 403
Porto Alegre, RS - CEP 90570-060
	
*   phone 55(51)3061-3588
*    fax 55(51)3061-3588
	*   mobile 55(51)8151-8212
*   email alessandro.ren@opservices.com.br
<mailto:%22alessandro.ren@opservices.com.br%22> 
	
__________________________________________________



-- 
__________________________________________________

Alessandro Ren
	OpServices
Luciana de Abreu, 471 - Sala 403
Porto Alegre, RS - CEP 90570-060
	
*   phone 55(51)3061-3588
*    fax 55(51)3061-3588
	*   mobile 55(51)8151-8212
*   email alessandro.ren@opservices.com.br
<mailto:%22alessandro.ren@opservices.com.br%22> 
	
__________________________________________________


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 22660 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-04-17 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-26 13:41 [LARTC] Problems in Dead Gateway Detection / Failover - Multiple Manish Kathuria
2006-01-29 19:50 ` [LARTC] Problems in Dead Gateway Detection / Failover - gypsy
2006-01-30  3:50 ` Manish Kathuria
2006-04-15 13:58 ` [LARTC] Problems in Dead Gateway Detection / Failover - Multiple Eduardo Fernández
2006-04-17  7:14 ` Re:[LARTC] Problems in Dead Gateway Detection / Failover - Shashikant Mundlik
2006-04-17 14:01 ` [LARTC] Problems in Dead Gateway Detection / Failover Alessandro Ren
2006-04-17 15:16 ` Alessandro Ren
2006-04-17 15:22 ` Shashikant Mundlik
2006-04-17 15:52 ` Shashikant Mundlik [this message]
2006-04-17 16:30 ` [LARTC] Problems in Dead Gateway Detection / LinuXKiD
2006-04-17 17:11 ` [LARTC] Problems in Dead Gateway Detection / Failover Alessandro Ren
2006-04-21  1:49 ` [LARTC] Problems in Dead Gateway Detection / Failover - Multiple Manish Kathuria

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4443b700.67aae59b.0211.45dc@mx.gmail.com \
    --to=shashikant.mundlik@gmail.com \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.