From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] calloc arguments
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:19:38 -0500
Message-ID: <4444228A.4000405@us.ibm.com>
References: <1145307019.16042.110.camel@basalt.austin.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <1145307019.16042.110.camel@basalt.austin.ibm.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> Hi, it looks like a few users of calloc had their arguments backwards. I
> checked the other users and they seem fine.
>
> Since one of those is in ioemu code, does that mean we (I?) will be
> submitting that bug to qemu upstream?
>   

The bug isn't present in upstream QEmu as this file isn't present.  I 
imagine this is part of the VNC patch that lives externally to QEmu.

In general, QEmu does not use any calloc()'s and instead prefers to use 
a malloc wrapper (qemu_mallocz) within the actual emulator.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori