From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jandre Olivier <jandre@megaserve.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:35:37 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Matching with Layer7 vs. IPP2P
Message-Id: <4445E849.1040608@megaserve.net>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <e23tr3$ce3$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <e23tr3$ce3$1@sea.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

I was just about to post the same post,

I currently use ipp2p and it works pretty well, It just doesnt seem to 
track morpheous(fasttrack) protocols, otherwise it works pretty well. I 
have quite alot of connections and havent seen any performance issues. 
My next step is to add L7 as well with ipp2p to completely block/shape p2p.

However I find L7 bit more tricky than ipp2p to compile
Cannot comment on L7

J


Arik Raffael Funke wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> can anybody comment on the cost of matching with IPP2P vs. Layer7.
> 
> Also, does a iptables rule with more complicated matching mechanism also 
> slow down processing if all the packets are matched before they reach 
> the rule. I.e. is the mere existence of a potentially costly rule 
> already slowing down processing or only if packets are actually 
> processed by it?
> 
> Thanks very much in advance.
> 
> Best regards,
> Arik
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list
> LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

-- 
/*---------------------------------------------------------------------*/
                         __   _
             ---------- / /  (_)__  __ ____  __  ---------
               ------- / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / --------
                 ---- /____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ ------
                    localhost@localdomain.za.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc