From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bulpin Subject: Re: hg pull: out-of-memory errors? ("abort: group to be added is empty!") Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:25:47 +0100 Message-ID: <44469CCB.5020803@xensource.com> References: <1145473446.9435.37.camel@basalt.austin.ibm.com> <1145473850.21283.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1145473850.21283.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Bryan O'Sullivan Cc: xen-devel , Hollis Blanchard List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org There is nothing untoward in any log as far as I can see. The oom killer hasn't come out to play either. Anyway, xenbits is now running 0.8.1, I'll upgrade as Bryan suggests once a new version is called. We've had 0.8.1 testing on an internal server for a few days so I have confidence the upgrade should be safe. As ever, do let me know if any problems are seen. Note that the temporary server that the 3.0-testing tree is redirected to is still running 0.7 but will disappear shortly once I move the hosting to our new colo centre. Regards, James Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 14:04 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > > >>Could you check the xenbits server logs to see if there are hg processes >>being killed, possibly because of out-of-memory conditions? Thanks... > > > It may also be worth upgrading the server to the current tip version of > Mercurial, once that has seen some more testing. Matt just merged some > changes written by Chris Mason that reduce disk and memory usage > substantially, which should reduce the squeeze that the xenbits server > gets put under. > > I'll see what we can do to print a more useful error message when the > xenbits server gets killed, as it's quite a common problem. > >