From: Martijn Lievaart <m@rtij.nl>
To: Massimiliano Hofer <max@nucleus.it>
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: condition for 2.6.16
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:44:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4447E498.7060006@rtij.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200604202139.02931.max@nucleus.it>
Massimiliano Hofer wrote:
>On Thursday 20 April 2006 8:49 pm, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>
>>We have already decided that the condition match will not be merged
>>because the same thing can easily be done by adding/removing rules
>>from userspace.
>>
>>
>
>Sorry, I missed that discussion.
>Is it still possible to include it in the external patches?
>
>Anyway I think condition allows for a much more elegant solution in cases
>where adding and removing rules would lead to a messy and unpredictable
>sequence of overlapping rules, not to mention races between different
>modifications.
>Just my humble opinion.
>
>
I concur. The condition match is much more elegant then dynamically
messing with the rules.
M4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-20 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-20 17:19 condition for 2.6.16 Massimiliano Hofer
2006-04-20 18:49 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-20 19:39 ` Massimiliano Hofer
2006-04-20 19:44 ` Martijn Lievaart [this message]
2006-04-20 22:47 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-20 23:26 ` Massimiliano Hofer
2006-04-21 0:41 ` Gerd v. Egidy
2006-04-21 0:48 ` Gerd v. Egidy
2006-04-21 9:29 ` Amin Azez
2006-04-23 13:47 ` Simon Lodal
2006-04-28 7:12 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-28 10:46 ` Massimiliano Hofer
2006-04-28 11:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-28 12:44 ` Massimiliano Hofer
2006-04-28 12:58 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-04-28 13:07 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-28 15:18 ` KOVACS Krisztian
2006-04-28 15:34 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-29 0:53 ` Massimiliano Hofer
2006-04-29 2:56 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-29 15:36 ` Massimiliano Hofer
2006-04-28 13:18 ` Massimiliano Hofer
2006-04-28 13:09 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-28 13:26 ` Massimiliano Hofer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4447E498.7060006@rtij.nl \
--to=m@rtij.nl \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=max@nucleus.it \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.