From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWkyz-0001Bc-0u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:02:53 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWkyw-0001BL-OH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:02:52 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWkyw-0001BG-K4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:02:50 -0400 Received: from [68.142.198.210] (helo=smtp111.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FWl0O-0002Pg-JF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:04:20 -0400 Message-ID: <44483D41.4020507@cnpbagwell.com> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:02:41 -0500 From: Chris Bagwell MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] New usb tablet and numlock Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi all, I'm enjoying the new usb tablet device under windows 98. When the "grabless" mode is enabled, I notice that the numlock keys can get out of sync. Anyone else seeing this? For instance, if I have numlock enabled and then start qemu with tablet support, my win98 thinks numlock is off when I move the mouse into the window (even though numlock LED is on). I have to toggle numlock off (LED off) to get the win98 host to think numlock is on. Unrelated, I also have a general USB issue which makes me almost not use it. If I run qemu without -usb option then an idle win98 guest with linux host puts a load of about 5% on my 800Mhz processor. When I run with -usb the idle is 60% minimum. Anyone have some suggestions of were code could be optimized for idle periods? Thanks for th great program! Chris