From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
To: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] shadow threads with prio 0 / SCHED_NORMAL
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:18:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4449220E.5000900@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44491B68.5080905@domain.hid>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2506 bytes --]
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> > What I suggested was to let people create normal threads using >
>> pthread_create (likely conforming to the SCHED_OTHER policy), then use
>> > the redirected pthread_setschedparam syscall (i.e. always applied
>> to the > current thread) to promote them as Xenomai shadows, but
>> leave them in > their original scheduling class. The same goes for
>> rt_task_shadow. This > would be explicit actions that would not leave
>> much room for "surprises".
>>
>> If I understand correctly, you mean that one should not be able to
>> create real-time threads with pthread_create. My question was about what
>> to do of explicit scheduling parameters passed to pthread_create through
>> thread creation attributes.
>
> Nope, this is obviously not what I meant... :o>
>
> This is how one would create hybrids, without changing anything else to
> the current interface:
>
> pthread_attr_init(&attr);
> ...
> pthread_attr_setschedpolicy(&attr,SCHED_OTHER);
> ...
> pthread_create(...,&attr,&foo,NULL);
>
> and,
>
> void *foo (void *cookie)
> {
> /* The following call maps a shadow thread to "current", but
> currently only accepts SCHED_FIFO, and would be changed to
> allow SCHED_OTHER/NORMAL. */
> pthread_setschedparam(...,SCHED_OTHER,...);
> /* OR, for the native API */
> rt_task_shadow(...,pri=0,...);
> }
>
I think it melts down to the question: which kind of SCHED_OTHER threads
will be more common in applications, the hybrid or the normal ones?
Remember that we also still have the __real_pthread_create interface for
creating /really/ normal threads...
The advantage of making hybrids default, even for the attr=NULL case,
would be that the user will be able to interact with real-time
SCHED_FIFO/RR threads without further coding effort (might be
interesting for porting existing apps...).
How much overhead would default-shadowing introduce when it is not used
actively? Is it just the kernel pthread structure? Maybe we should
consider allocating that structure from normal kernel memory to save
rt-memory resources (under memory pressure, there is a risk in failing
to create the Linux mate anyway). I could also imagine that SCHED_OTHER
threads will get started in relaxed mode by default so that the Xenomai
scheduler will not be additionally loaded.
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-21 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-19 22:01 [Xenomai-core] [RFC] shadow threads with prio 0 / SCHED_NORMAL Jan Kiszka
2006-04-20 12:55 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-04-21 10:46 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-04-21 15:21 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2006-04-21 15:47 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-04-21 16:00 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2006-04-21 16:41 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-04-21 17:40 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2006-04-21 17:50 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-04-21 18:18 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2006-04-21 21:40 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-04-21 16:03 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-06-04 17:58 ` Philippe Gerum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4449220E.5000900@domain.hid \
--to=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=rpm@xenomai.org \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.