From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Vilain Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Implement 'prior' commit object links Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:34:56 +1200 Message-ID: <444DA6F0.2090401@vilain.net> References: <20060425035421.18382.51677.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 25 06:35:18 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FYFGc-0000c0-Hb for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 06:35:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751381AbWDYEfK (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:35:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751383AbWDYEfK (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:35:10 -0400 Received: from watts.utsl.gen.nz ([202.78.240.73]:48768 "EHLO watts.utsl.gen.nz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751381AbWDYEfJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:35:09 -0400 Received: by watts.utsl.gen.nz (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 55580506B; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:35:06 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (longdrop.watts.utsl.gen.nz [192.168.255.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by watts.utsl.gen.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63C238A2 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:34:59 +1200 (NZST) User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060425035421.18382.51677.stgit@localhost.localdomain> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on mail.watts.utsl.gen.nz X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Sam Vilain wrote: > In this case, the "prior" link would point to the last revision of > a patch. Tools would probably > > ... support only doing this for selected, "published" patch chains