All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <444F3990.5030100@sgi.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index f95115f..cf6ad3f 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ Dean Nelson wrote:
 >>> gen_pool allocator not write to the memory being managed. See the
 >>> following:
 >>>
->>>   http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m\x113518602713125&w=2
->>>   http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m\x113533568827916&w=2
+>>>   http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=113518602713125&w=2
+>>>   http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=113533568827916&w=2
 >> hm, fair enough.
 >>
 >> The patch is fairly large+intrusive.  I trust it's been broadly tested?
@@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ the right thing to me. In either case, please don't (void) the function
 return (this is a style issue, I know).
 
 > Index: linux-2.6/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/cache.c
-> =================================> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/cache.c	2006-04-24 12:25:36.234717101 -0500
+> ===================================================================
+> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/cache.c	2006-04-24 12:25:36.234717101 -0500
 > +++ linux-2.6/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/cache.c	2006-04-24 12:27:56.012899026 -0500
 
 This part we should maybe do in a seperate patch? It seems valid on it's
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 68d3440..36318d4 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
  "ref\020060425155051.GA19248@sgi.com\0"
  "From\0Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] change gen_pool allocator to not touch managed memory\0"
- "Date\0Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:12:48 +0000\0"
+ "Date\0Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:12:48 +0200\0"
  "To\0Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com>\0"
  "Cc\0Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>"
   tony.luck@intel.com
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@
  ">>> gen_pool allocator not write to the memory being managed. See the\n"
  ">>> following:\n"
  ">>>\n"
- ">>>   http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m\0213518602713125&w=2\n"
- ">>>   http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m\0213533568827916&w=2\n"
+ ">>>   http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=113518602713125&w=2\n"
+ ">>>   http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=113533568827916&w=2\n"
  ">> hm, fair enough.\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">> The patch is fairly large+intrusive.  I trust it's been broadly tested?\n"
@@ -66,7 +66,8 @@
  "return (this is a style issue, I know).\n"
  "\n"
  "> Index: linux-2.6/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/cache.c\n"
- "> =================================> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/cache.c\t2006-04-24 12:25:36.234717101 -0500\n"
+ "> ===================================================================\n"
+ "> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/cache.c\t2006-04-24 12:25:36.234717101 -0500\n"
  "> +++ linux-2.6/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/cache.c\t2006-04-24 12:27:56.012899026 -0500\n"
  "\n"
  "This part we should maybe do in a seperate patch? It seems valid on it's\n"
@@ -75,4 +76,4 @@
  "Cheers,\n"
  Jes
 
-3e0f0cca7439798d41977c92475b18fd58b39c233dc33a3c2683fc9fd3e68744
+b0b8025a69a26e13f205d24c78b62c112cd552d002f38164f8a2ad340d4edc89

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.