Re: [LARTC] Sip Traffic

[sophana <sophana@zizi.ath.cx>]

what about using a sip proxy?
I'm not sure, but the rtp traffic goes though the sip proxy does it?
then you can prioritize traffic with the sip proxy process user id 
(assuming that you can have a proxy on your router)

I have a much more basic question:
I installed a qos script based on wondershaper, which is htb based.
With voip, the result is not correct (I've lot of bandwidth with max prio)
How can I mix absolute priority (for voip) with htb?

Thanks

LinuXKiD wrote:

>Hi.
>
>there is a way to MARK udp VOIP (SIP) traffic,
>in order to put in a highest prio class ?
>
>Traffic flow seems start on udp 5060 port, but
>next both server and client seems jump to a 
>random(?) port.
>	
>I can't use CONNMARK because is udp traffic.
>
>I only see a pattern for L7 patch in order to 
>SIP traffic identification , but I run 2.4 
>kernel series . 
>
>When you patch 2.4 kernel with L7 patch,
>later, Connmark (patch o matic ) can't apply.
>(conflicts)
>
>thank you.
>--
>Andres 
>_______________________________________________
>LARTC mailing list
>LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
>http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc