From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@google.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] OCFS2 features RFC
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:50:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <444FA4C5.9010608@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060425215548.GB16170@lst.de>
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 11:35:53AM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
>>-Htree support
>
> Please not. htree is just the worst possible directory format around.
> Do some nice hashed or btree directories, but don't try this odd hack
> again.
Could you be specific about what you think is odd about it?
> Especially as the only reason it was developed for in ext2/3
> doesn't work very well in a cluster filesystem anyway
In what way?
> to access the
> new htree all nodes would have to support the format anyway, so the
> whole easy up/downgrade thing doesn't matter at all.
Good point, and this only affects the leaf node format.
Regards,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-26 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-25 18:35 [Ocfs2-devel] OCFS2 features RFC Mark Fasheh
2006-04-25 21:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-04-25 22:24 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-04-26 16:50 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2006-04-26 4:11 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-26 18:06 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-04-26 18:08 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-26 18:34 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-04-27 20:25 ` Paul Taysom
2006-05-03 23:04 ` [Ocfs2-devel] OCFS2 features RFC - separate journal? Daniel Phillips
2006-05-04 0:29 ` Zach Brown
2006-05-04 0:46 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-05-04 20:56 ` Zach Brown
2006-05-04 20:59 ` Wim Coekaerts
2006-05-04 22:23 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-05-04 22:30 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-05-05 3:05 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-05-05 18:25 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-05-06 3:09 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-05-05 17:12 ` Paul Taysom
2006-05-05 18:06 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-05-05 18:57 ` Sunil Mushran
2006-05-08 14:28 ` Paul Taysom
2006-05-08 17:43 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-05-08 18:00 ` Paul Taysom
2006-05-08 18:22 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-05-11 20:04 ` [Ocfs2-devel] OCFS2 features RFC Jeff Mahoney
2006-05-11 20:40 ` Paul Taysom
2006-05-11 20:55 ` Joel Becker
2006-05-11 21:16 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-05-17 1:44 ` Mark Fasheh
[not found] ` <446BBCF5.7040903@google.com>
[not found] ` <20060518024638.GY21588@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
2006-05-19 0:35 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-05-19 15:16 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-05-20 6:11 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-05-22 19:18 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-05-22 17:01 ` Paul Taysom
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-02 18:22 [Ocfs2-devel] OCFS2 Features RFC Brian Long
2006-05-02 20:29 ` Sunil Mushran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=444FA4C5.9010608@google.com \
--to=phillips@google.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.