All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Perkel <marc@perkel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: A Question for the Worlds Smartest Network Minds
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:34:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4450039F.20704@perkel.com> (raw)

I hope this question isn't too far off topic but I'm having a very weird 
network problem and don't know where to ask it. Perhaps someone could 
point me in the right direction. I have an unusual packet loss problem 
that has me stumped.

Working at home with a cable modem connected to a Linksys WRT54G router. 
Behind the router are two computers. One is a Linux server and a windows 
XP notebook.

The Linux box is accessable to the outside world because I opened 3 
ports in the NAT. Port 22,25,and 53. The server acts as a name server 
for the domains I host and it also is a backup spam filtering server 
receiving many incomming connections on port 25 and sending out far less 
good email also on port 25 to various other server who I am the front 
ens spam filter for.

Linux box is running FC5 with the latest stock FC5 kernel. Some flavor 
of 2.6.16.

Here's the problem. I can ping the router gateway 192.168.2.1 fine from 
both computers with no packet loss if I turn off the Exim SMTP daemon. 
But if I turn it on then I get about 10% packet loss pinging the gateway 
on both the Linux and Windows computers, both plugged into the Linksys 
router.

Thinking it might be the quantity of traffic I tried uploading a large 
file with rsync ovser SSH which creates a lot more traffic than the SMTP 
traffic (which is about 50k or so) and no packet loss.

I only get packet loss if I have Port 25 traffic.

So - what could cause traffing on just port 25 to cause 2 computers to 
have backet loss? Could it be related to the number of connections? It 
does seem like when I turn on the SMTP that it takes a little while 
before the packet loss starts. Say 3 minutes or so.

Thanks in advance.


                 reply	other threads:[~2006-04-26 23:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4450039F.20704@perkel.com \
    --to=marc@perkel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.