All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fabrice Bellard <fabrice@bellard.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Bios Bug?
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:38:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44529956.4040300@bellard.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s45240b6.051@mail.bhmsd.k12.in.us>

The bug comes from the APM CPU idle function added in the Bochs BIOS. I 
am about to commit a fix.

Fabrice.

Ben Dailey wrote:
> Ed,
> 
> You should also note that I have not been able to use the new
> -kernel-kqemu option with the old bios. The bios in cvs was specifically
> patched for the new kqemu support from my understanding so that is
> expected. Just a quick heads.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ben
> 
> 
>>>>eswierk@arastra.com 04/28/06 4:05 PM >>>
> 
> On 4/28/06, Ben Dailey <bdailey@bhmsd.k12.in.us> wrote:
> 
>>After much searching I believe I have found a problem with the bochs
>>bios in cvs. I found that I was not able to boot the fedora core 5 or
> 
> 4
> 
>>or 3 rescue cds or the Fedora 4 image from free.oszoo.org. Fedora core
> 
> 2
> 
>>booted correctly as well as Windows 2000 and Windows XP. I tried the
>>build with and without kqemu support and changed from gcc3.2 to gcc3.4
>>to no change. I then copied the bios from 0.8.0 and now all boots
>>correctly. My host system is Fedora 4 on X86_64. Is/has anyone else
> 
> seen
> 
>>this problem?
> 
> 
> Yes, I just ran into the same problem with the bios.bin from the
> 2006-04-27_23 CVS snapshot. Thanks for tracking it down--you probably
> saved me hours!
> 
> I was able to boot after reverting to the bios.bin from the
> 2006-03-27_23 snapshot. So the problem must have been introduced
> within the past month.
> 
> --Ed
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-28 22:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-28 21:19 [Qemu-devel] Bios Bug? Ben Dailey
2006-04-28 22:38 ` Fabrice Bellard [this message]
2006-04-28 22:56   ` Ed Swierk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-28 18:58 Ben Dailey
2006-04-28 21:05 ` Ed Swierk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44529956.4040300@bellard.org \
    --to=fabrice@bellard.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.