All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>,
	"Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] kernel documentation
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 14:00:04 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44550834.xrXSv8h38b@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160720171026.7d9d2c2b@lwn.net>

On Wednesday 20 Jul 2016 17:10:26 Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:56:31 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > I think it'd be great if interested parties (might be just a hallway
> > track) sit together and figure out how to best go about converting all
> > the existing docs over, and how to link it all together.
> 
> I had thought about proposing a similar topic.  I think it could also be
> useful to have a brief session on how the new stuff works.

I'd be more interested in that than in a session that discusses the process of 
converting existing documentation. It's up to each subsystem to move away from 
DocBook, I don't really see what we would have to discuss there.

That being said, in order to make the documentation consistent, we'll need 
some level of bikeshedding to decide on guidelines for maintainers and 
developers. I don't want to spend the kernel summit bikeshedding, but maybe a 
high-level discussion on what we need could be useful.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-29 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-20 11:56 [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] kernel documentation Daniel Vetter
2016-07-20 12:03 ` Julia Lawall
2016-07-20 12:40 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-07-20 23:10 ` Jonathan Corbet
2016-07-29 11:00   ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2016-08-01 10:40   ` Johannes Berg
2016-08-02 14:34 ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44550834.xrXSv8h38b@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=markus.heiser@darmarit.de \
    --cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.