From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bill Burdick Subject: cvsserver problem with eclipse? Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 07:27:31 +0000 Message-ID: <4455B863.8040808@mobilereasoning.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000202000401050204010706" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 01 19:25:03 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fac8n-0006V9-Jt for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 19:24:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932133AbWEARYz (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 13:24:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932143AbWEARYz (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 13:24:55 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-02.rdc-kc.rr.com ([24.94.166.122]:40442 "EHLO ms-smtp-02.rdc-kc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932133AbWEARYy (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 13:24:54 -0400 Received: from Shofar.mobilereasoning.com (CPE-24-166-171-225.kc.res.rr.com [24.166.171.225]) by ms-smtp-02.rdc-kc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k41HOqTr026219 for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 12:24:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: by Shofar.mobilereasoning.com (Postfix, from userid 1012) id 456FB22C1E; Mon, 1 May 2006 11:40:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [10.0.0.10] (hiram.mobilereasoning.com [10.0.0.10]) by Shofar.mobilereasoning.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E262B208F2 for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 11:40:29 -0500 (CDT) User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on Shofar.mobilereasoning.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000202000401050204010706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [taking this conversation to the list] OK, I changed the way I was testing this to match your usage plan and I still got the same results. It works just fine for vanilla CVS; cvs status shows the re revision in the repo and cvs update brings it in. Eclipse has the same funky behavior: Compare with latest at the project level shows no differences, but compare with latest on the changed file actually does an update instead of popping up the Eclipse diff viewer. By the way, I had trouble at first accessing the repo with SSH because of permissions on the sqlite db. I'm not totally sure about the implications for multiple users, but maybe just using a common group will work fine? I'm really happy with git and git-cvsserver! I'm hoping to be able to standardize on it for our Eclipse work. It seems like it should be possible for us to continue to do integrations in Eclipse if we manage git properly. I've been waiting on arch, baz, and bzr for so long and then suddenly, Linus pulls this out of his butt! Bill Burdick ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *Martin Langhoff (CatalystIT)* < martin@catalyst.net.nz > Date: May 1, 2006 6:41 AM Subject: Re: cvsserver problem with eclipse? To: Bill Burdick > Cc: Martyn Smith < martyn@catalyst.net.nz > Hi Bill, the git repo you are using, did you set it up to just be a "naked" or "bare" repo, and enabled cvsserver alright? What version of git are you using? My usage plan would be to 1 - Have a git test project 2 - Publish it to a naked/bare repository where git-cvsserver is enabled 3 - Get the cvs checkout (try commandline cvs to make sure things work) 4 - Add commits in the git test project and push them to the repo 5 - Run cvs update If it's running ok with old school CVS client, then try with Eclipse. We have tested the update scenario quite a bit, and it works for us, so we need a bit more info. BTW, can I ask you to bounce these questions off the git@vger.kernel.org mailing list? We will be happier answering these questions in a way that gets archived publicly. (Unless you are a direct client of Catalyst IT, that is! Are you at OpenUniversity perhaps?) cheers, martin Bill Burdick wrote: > I made a test git repo with a branch called WillyTest and slurped it > into Eclipse. Then I checked out WillyTest into the git directory and > committed a change. A synchronize in Eclipse did not detect the change, > nor did comparing with the latest on the head. Showing history on the > changed file did, however, list the new revision and I could access the > contents from that view. Compare with latest on the changed file > actually replaces the current contents with the repository version. > > Bill Burdick > -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Martin @ Catalyst .Net .NZ Ltd, PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington WEB: http://catalyst.net.nz/ PHYS: Level 2, 150-154 Willis St OFFICE: +64(4)916-7224 MOB: +64(21)364-017 Make things as simple as possible, but no simpler - Einstein ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------000202000401050204010706 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=utf-8; name="bill.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="bill.vcf" begin:vcard fn:Bill Burdick n:Burdick;Bill org:Mobile Reasoning email;internet:bill@mobilereasoning.com title:Chief Scientist tel;work:913-484-0172 x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard --------------000202000401050204010706--