All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Kuiper <tkuiper-netfilter@inxsoft.net>
To: Cedric Blancher <blancher@cartel-securite.fr>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: about dettecting different TTL value
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 15:50:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <445860BB.5030307@inxsoft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1146641546.28003.20.camel@anduril.intranet.cartel-securite.net>

Cedric Blancher wrote:
> Second situation, there are solutions. One deployed is PPPoE links, even
> for cable modems. If users have to set a PPP links, then you can
> restrict a given login to one tunnel at the same time, you can restrict
> one modem to establish one tunnel at the same time, you can attach BPF
> filter to you PPP link (to enforce source IP as an example), etc.

But they can still use NAT behind a second router right? :-) I think the 
whole connection sharing issues for ISP's is that they want to sell a second 
account to someone else in that house. Its bogus cause one pays (normally) 
for an agreed link speed (no matter how many computers are behind the router 
and it will still be the same up/downlink speed to the ISP). Traffic amount 
doesn't concern either as the user should have the right to use the line as 
much as the contract allows.

And how many ISP's are there who promise a certain speed but never deliver it...

Still, to remain netfilter related in this topic, its a security question if 
its possible to force without third party software that only one computer 
uses a link, and the question remains if its possible to do it with 
netfilter (I doubt).

BR,
Thomas


  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-03  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-03  4:41 about dettecting different TTL value isp
2006-05-03  5:18 ` Thomas Kuiper
2006-05-03  5:30   ` Cedric Blancher
2006-05-03  5:53     ` Thomas Kuiper
2006-05-03  7:32       ` Cedric Blancher
2006-05-03  7:50         ` Thomas Kuiper [this message]
2006-05-03  8:12           ` Cedric Blancher
2006-05-03  5:23 ` Cedric Blancher
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-24  4:36 isp
2006-04-24  5:15 ` Bob Sully
2006-04-24  9:44 ` Curby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=445860BB.5030307@inxsoft.net \
    --to=tkuiper-netfilter@inxsoft.net \
    --cc=blancher@cartel-securite.fr \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.