From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.17-rc2-mm1
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 09:12:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <445865F7.1010208@shadowen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200605030938.37967.ak@suse.de>
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 May 2006 09:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>>>>><EOE>new stack 0 (0 0 0 10082 10)
>>>>
>>>>Looks like <rubbish> <SS> <RSP> <RFLAGS> <CS> to me, ...
>>>
>>>Hmm, right.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Hmm weird. There isn't anything resembling an exception frame at the top of the
>>>>>stack. No idea how this could happen.
>>>>
>>>>... which is a valid frame where the stack pointer was corrupted before the exception occurred. One more printed
>>
>>item
>>
>>>>(or rather, starting items at estack_end[-1]) would allow at least seeing what RIP this came from.
>>>
>>>Any can you add that please and check?
>>
>>???
>
>
> Sorry I meant to write Andy but left out the d :-( - he did the testing
> on the machine that showed the problem.
Heh, happy to do the testing. Just to make sure I am doing the right
thing, you want an entire stack frame dropped out in the case that
SS/RSP are 0; so we get the RIP.
-apw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-03 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-27 16:47 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-04-28 8:20 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-04-28 8:20 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-05-01 14:24 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2006-05-01 14:24 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2006-05-01 17:07 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-05-01 17:07 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-05-01 17:14 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-01 17:14 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-01 17:19 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Badari Pulavarty
2006-05-01 17:19 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Badari Pulavarty
2006-05-01 17:26 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-01 17:26 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-01 17:55 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Badari Pulavarty
2006-05-01 17:55 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Badari Pulavarty
2006-05-01 17:57 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-01 17:57 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-01 18:32 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-01 18:32 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-01 23:29 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Badari Pulavarty
2006-05-01 23:29 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Badari Pulavarty
2006-05-01 17:32 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-02 20:20 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-01 18:34 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-05-01 18:34 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-05-02 13:20 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-02 13:20 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-02 20:00 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-02 20:09 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-05-03 6:47 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Jan Beulich
2006-05-03 6:49 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-05-03 7:08 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Jan Beulich
2006-05-03 7:38 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-05-03 8:12 ` Andy Whitcroft [this message]
2006-05-03 8:25 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Jan Beulich
2006-05-03 19:26 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-04 7:40 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-04 16:28 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-04 6:22 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Chuck Ebbert
2006-05-03 5:37 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Chuck Ebbert
2006-04-27 16:54 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-04-27 16:54 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-04-27 16:50 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-04-27 8:41 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-04-27 8:41 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-04-27 10:16 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-04-27 19:19 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-04-27 19:26 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-04-27 21:41 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Grant Coady
2006-04-27 21:50 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Randy.Dunlap
2006-04-27 22:16 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-04-27 10:27 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-04-27 13:07 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-04-27 15:28 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Greg KH
2006-04-27 15:32 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-04-27 20:53 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Greg KH
2006-04-27 22:09 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-04-27 15:26 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Greg KH
2006-04-27 15:43 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-04-27 15:47 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Matthieu CASTET
2006-04-27 18:02 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Vivek Goyal
2006-04-27 23:24 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Greg KH
2006-04-28 14:40 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Vivek Goyal
2006-04-28 16:07 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 matthieu castet
2006-04-28 18:05 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=445865F7.1010208@shadowen.org \
--to=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.