From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Edwin Whitelaw Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 11:58:07 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] iptables CLASSIFY vs fwmark? Message-Id: <445C8F4F.2040103@nrvunwired.net> List-Id: References: <445BD9FE.7000400@nrvunwired.net> In-Reply-To: <445BD9FE.7000400@nrvunwired.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org My observation also, but one example shows using fwmark in the PREROUTING chain while CLASSIFY can be used in POSTROUTING only (correct?). My experience with tc at this point is limited but sometimes added flexibility is useful, even if it's a little more effort. Edwin Denis Ovsienko wrote: >> Could someone comment on the benefits of using CLASSIFY vs fwmark (or >> vice versa) in iptables? >> > One benefit I see is that one avoids extra filters, this can be useful > with lots of classes. > > -- <=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=> Edwin Whitelaw, P.E. New River Valley Unwired, LLC 2200 Lonesome Dove Dr Christiansburg, VA 24073 540-239-0318 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc