From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FckMC-0006U9-6c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 07 May 2006 10:35:36 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FckM9-0006TV-VO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 07 May 2006 10:35:35 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FckM9-0006TS-Rw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 07 May 2006 10:35:33 -0400
Received: from [84.96.92.55] (helo=smtP.neuf.fr)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FckMm-0006Uk-Ji
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 07 May 2006 10:36:12 -0400
Received: from [84.102.211.243] by sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld
	(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-5.05 (built Feb 16 2006))
	with ESMTP id <0IYW00BFYGJ77TA0@sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld> for
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 07 May 2006 16:35:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 16:34:51 +0200
From: Fabrice Bellard <fabrice@bellard.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: "sleep" segfaults on qemu-0.8.1/kqemu-1.3.0pre6
In-reply-to: <e3k827$gcn$1@sea.gmane.org>
Message-id: <445E058B.2080801@bellard.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <46d6db660605050521t8eab9eajff24cf235acddaf2@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3k827$gcn$1@sea.gmane.org>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Right, it is a regression caused by a typo in kqemu 1.3.0pre6. I just 
released kqemu-1.3.0pre7 which should correct the issue. Windows 98 
should also work again with it.

Regards,

Fabrice.

Lorenzo Campedelli wrote:
> I see this also.
> 
> host is Fedora Core 4
> guest is a 2.4 kernel
> 
> It seems to die in modify_ldt(), the libc function just after returning 
> from the modify_ldt() system call, if I understand the traces.
> 
> This doesn't happen using the same qemu with kqemu-1.3.0pre5.
> 
> Attached are gdb and strace output, in case they can tell something more...
> 
> Regards,
> Lorenzo
> 
> 
> Christian MICHON wrote:
> 
>> Host: winXP pro
>> Guest: Redhat 7.2
>>
>> when kqemu (user mode) is active, "sleep 1" segfaults each time.
>> With kqemu disabled, no problem
>>
>> -- 
>> Christian