From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Subject: Re: Some questions about using heavy iptables rules in a Linux box .... Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:59:11 +0200 Message-ID: <44612CCF.5030400@gmx.net> References: <4460B502.4080903@lanl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: hbchen In-Reply-To: <4460B502.4080903@lanl.gov> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org hbchen wrote: > Hi, > I have some questions about using heavy iptables rules in a Linux box. > 1. Has anyone done a comparison of latency and throughput on traffic > through an > Linux node with and without IPtables (using lots of filtering rules)? > 2. How much CPU time is spending on iptables (heavy filtering rules)? > 3. Any significant impact (latency and throughput) on 10G ethernet link? May I suggest using nf-hipac? It's available at http://www.hipac.org/ . Especially for thousands of rules, it should be faster than iptables. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/