All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Domke <tmbinc@elitedvb.net>
To: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6 vs 2.4
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:43:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44649F09.2020803@elitedvb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82ecf08e0605120729l43041aebuaef375a568700354@mail.gmail.com>

Thiago Galesi wrote:
> Not much. This article is almost one year old. Even though some things
> do apply (like bigger footprint, etc), the kernel improved a lot on
> the months that followed that article.
> I've participated in a project that used a (somewhat patched) 2.6.10
> kernel, with soccessful results.
Can you point me to a list of changes which where done? I really like to
check if they apply to my performance problems with 2.6 kernels, i.e. if
it's worth porting the board specific changes to a newer kernel.

Felix

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-12 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-12  6:51 2.6 vs 2.4 Srinivas Murthy
2006-05-12 13:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-05-12 14:02   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-05-12 14:23   ` Felix Domke
2006-05-12 14:29 ` Thiago Galesi
2006-05-12 14:43   ` Felix Domke [this message]
2006-05-12 16:24     ` Thiago Galesi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44649F09.2020803@elitedvb.net \
    --to=tmbinc@elitedvb.net \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.