From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:42:34 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] HFSC and prioritization Message-Id: <4464BAFA.2030103@trash.net> List-Id: References: <0633E0EDB4F25F43A2D7179CA11FAFAB25533F@xavier.staff.greatlakes.net> In-Reply-To: <0633E0EDB4F25F43A2D7179CA11FAFAB25533F@xavier.staff.greatlakes.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Andy Furniss wrote: > One thing to note is that HFSC will drop, rather than pass unshaped, > traffic that is unclassified. > > So if you don't use a default class and don't filter arp to a class then > HFSC will appear broken whereas HTB will work. Good point, that is a trap that might easily make it appear as if HFSC is stalling under some conditions. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc