From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernard Pidoux Subject: different AX25.H files with same names Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 12:11:44 +0200 Message-ID: <44670260.2050105@ccr.jussieu.fr> References: <20060506223800.GA4419@linux-mips.org> <4465D18F.5070405@ccr.jussieu.fr> <20060513144258.GA3640@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060513144258.GA3640@linux-mips.org> Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Ralf Baechle DL5RB Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org Ralf Baechle DL5RB wrote : > On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 02:31:11PM +0200, Bernard Pidoux wrote: > >> By the way, its a long time since I want to ask if there is any reason >> to keep the same name for different ax25.h include files. >> >> /usr/include/netax25/ax25.h >> /usr/src/linux/include/linux/ax25.h >> /usr/src/linux/include/net/ax25.h >> >> Somehow it may be confusing. > > One for building applications, one for the kernel itself. > > 73 de DL5RB op Ralf > > -- > Loc. JN47BS / CQ 14 / ITU 28 / DOK A21 I understand that these files have different usage. This is why I think that they should have different names. Here is the content of /usr/src/linux/include/linux/ax25.h ---------------- /* * These are the public elements of the Linux kernel AX.25 code. A similar * file netrom.h exists for the NET/ROM protocol. */ #ifndef AX25_KERNEL_H #define AX25_KERNEL_H ---------------- So why not rename it ax25_kernel.h 73 de Bernard, f6bvp http://f6bvp.org http://rose.fpac.free.fr/MINI-HOWTO/ http://rose.fpac.free.fr/MINI-HOWTO-FR/