From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: please git pull ACPI for 2.6.17 Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 20:00:31 +0159 Message-ID: <44677056.1080004@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190]:19237 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751497AbWENSAz (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 May 2006 14:00:55 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so10218nfa for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 11:00:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Brown, Len" Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brown, Len napsal(a): >> is it possible to do so now, still before .17 release? > > I think that on April 3rd this was appropriate. > But now 6 weeks later in the release cycle I don't think it is > appropriate to do such a large pull. It seemed obvious, I just tried it, because there was a complain on bugzilla. > > I'm assuming this tree will not be pulled until the start of .18. Never mind. > > Jiri, > Is there a specific individual patch that you are wanting to have in > .17? I wanted to have ecdt-uid-hack there, because asus laptops' acpi is defunct, but as I said, it doesn't matter, 2.6.18-rc1 is not so far. thanks, - -- Jiri Slaby www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby \_.-^-._ jirislaby@gmail.com _.-^-._/ B67499670407CE62ACC8 22A032CC55C339D47A7E -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEZ3BWMsxVwznUen4RAsk4AKDEhjpLcItL1v1MXe7ZShvTLUmONACgqpG9 uQPOD1X8gS9SX0C2avn8Hj8= =l1s/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----