From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sun, 14 May 2006 20:39:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eastrmmtao01.cox.net ([68.230.240.38]:5268 "HELO eastrmmtao01.cox.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with SMTP id S8133622AbWENSju (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 May 2006 20:39:50 +0200 Received: from hermes.mountolympos.net ([70.160.186.45]) by eastrmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060514183943.EVXM17255.eastrmmtao01.cox.net@hermes.mountolympos.net> for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 14:39:43 -0400 Received: from zeus.mountolympos.net (zeus.mountolympos.net [192.168.2.2]) by hermes.mountolympos.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4A81677B for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 14:39:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (kronos.mountolympos.net [192.168.2.3]) by zeus.mountolympos.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75DC100A116 for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 14:39:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4467796E.8060000@mountolympos.net> Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 14:39:42 -0400 From: John Miller User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060402) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: Instruction error with cache opcode References: <446735C6.2080306@mountolympos.net> <002a01c67761$253e97f0$0202a8c0@Ulysses> In-Reply-To: <002a01c67761$253e97f0$0202a8c0@Ulysses> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 11420 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: jamiller1110@cox.net Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips > Where and how is the value of Index_Store_Tag_I defined? > > Regards, > > Kevin K. > I included asm/cacheops.h from the kernel tree, it is defined there as : #define Index_Store_Tag_I 0x08 I also tried to substitute 0x08 directly into my source and I got the same error. Strangely enough, if I remove the include line, I get the same exact error.