From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932160AbWEPRTR (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2006 13:19:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932162AbWEPRTR (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2006 13:19:17 -0400 Received: from EXCHG2003.microtech-ks.com ([24.124.14.122]:42905 "EHLO EXCHG2003.microtech-ks.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932160AbWEPRTR (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2006 13:19:17 -0400 Message-ID: <446A0996.50709@atipa.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:19:18 -0500 From: Roger Heflin User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060313) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux-Kernel , openib-general@openib.org Subject: Heads-up for anyone using certain thunderbird message filter features Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2006 17:10:51.0873 (UTC) FILETIME=[AF445510:01C6790B] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Off topic - but probably very important to people using thunderbird as an email client. I am using certain thunderbird message filter features - mainly move to folder and then delete from pop server (this is done as a single step). I am on 2 mailing lists that received the same patch set, of the 54 patches emails, 15 patches when to one folder (kernel), 41 patches when to the other folder (openib), and 3 went to both. So anyone using this should watch as the filter does act odd, I suspect that it may be that since the message id is the same that, that may be what it is using to delete the message and may cause it to get both messages, the emails that I got both copies of were delayed by quote a bit and very likely came in on different email downloads, so the other email were not there to delete. Roger