From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932084AbWEPPVm (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2006 11:21:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932089AbWEPPVm (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2006 11:21:42 -0400 Received: from public.id2-vpn.continvity.gns.novell.com ([195.33.99.129]:20682 "EHLO emea1-mh.id2.novell.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932084AbWEPPVl (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2006 11:21:41 -0400 Message-Id: <446A0A57.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.1 Beta Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:22:31 +0200 From: "Jan Beulich" To: "Ingo Molnar" Cc: "Andrew Morton" , "Andreas Kleen" , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support References: <4469FC07.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> <20060516143937.GA10760@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20060516143937.GA10760@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> Ingo Molnar 16.05.06 16:39 >>> >> +config STACK_UNWIND >> + bool "Stack unwind support" >> + depends on UNWIND_INFO >> + depends on n > >'depends on n' ? Also, i think this should be 'default y'. The code is Subsequent patches then change it to X86_64 and then X86. This is just so the patch can be used standalone. >very clean. Curious: how much testing has it seen? The code, in slightly different shape, has been in use in NLKD (and its non-Linux ancestor) for several years. The only new code is the hook-up for the stack trace display functions, where I tried to make sure I test all (known to me) possibilities. Jan