From: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
To: "Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]" <Vincent.Fortier1@EC.GC.CA>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel vs drivers releases?
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:45:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <446B5329.7010007@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8E8F647D7835334B985D069AE964A4F7024640@ECQCMTLMAIL1.quebec.int.ec.gc.ca>
Fortier,Vincent [Montreal] wrote:
> On the other hand many people want's to get a full stabilisation of the
> actual API...
Not meaning to sound harsh, I think you belong in this category:
You think you want a stable kernel interface, but you really do
not, and you don't even know it.
See Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt
Daniel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-17 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-17 12:31 Kernel vs drivers releases? Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
2006-05-17 12:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-05-17 16:45 ` Daniel Drake [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=446B5329.7010007@gentoo.org \
--to=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=Vincent.Fortier1@EC.GC.CA \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.