From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert Lee Subject: About the naming of ata_drive_probe_reset() Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:00:32 +0800 Message-ID: <446BE350.5000504@tw.ibm.com> Reply-To: albertl@mail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:61133 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750718AbWERDAe (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2006 23:00:34 -0400 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4I30TX5003350 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 23:00:29 -0400 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.8) with ESMTP id k4I30TBl192384 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 21:00:29 -0600 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4I30TeP024627 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 21:00:29 -0600 Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Jeff Garzik , Linux IDE Hi Tejun, The ata_drive_probe_reset() is not drive-specific. Actually what got reset is the port. (I guess the "drive" doesn't mean device here.) Maybe something like ata_port_probe_reset() or ata_do_probe_reset() is less ambiguous? -- albert