From: Chuck Lever <cel@citi.umich.edu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: cel@netapp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] nfs: check all iov segments for correct memory access rights
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:46:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <446E1287.4070200@citi.umich.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060519112231.5ed3d565.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Chuck Lever <cel@netapp.com> wrote:
>> +static ssize_t check_access_ok(int type, const struct iovec *iov, unsigned long nr_segs)
>> +{
>> + ssize_t count = 0;
>> + ssize_t retval = -EINVAL;
>> + unsigned long seg;
>> +
>> + for (seg = 0; seg < nr_segs; seg++) {
>> + void __user *buf = iov[seg].iov_base;
>> + ssize_t len = (ssize_t) iov[seg].iov_len;
>> +
>> + if (len < 0) /* size_t not fitting an ssize_t .. */
>> + goto out;
>
> do_readv_writev() already checked for negative iov_len, and that's the more
> appropriate place to do it, rather than duplicating it in each filesystem
> (or forgetting to!)
>
> So is this check really needed?
Ok, didn't see that function before. Badari, is this checking still needed?
>> + if (unlikely(!access_ok(type, buf, len))) {
>> + retval = -EFAULT;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>
> Now what's up here? Why does NFS, at this level, care about the page's
> virtual address? get_user_pages() will handle that?
Interesting point. That may be a historical artifact that can be
removed. I'll take a look.
--
corporate: cel at netapp dot com
personal: chucklever at bigfoot dot com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-19 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-19 17:56 [PATCH 0/6] Support scatter/gather I/O in NFS direct I/O path Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] nfs: "open code" the NFS direct write rescheduler Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:10 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-19 18:37 ` Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-19 18:56 ` Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] nfs: remove user_addr and user_count from nfs_direct_req Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] nfs: Eliminate nfs_get_user_pages() Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:17 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-19 19:18 ` Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] nfs: alloc nfs_read/write_data as direct I/O is scheduled Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] nfs: check all iov segments for correct memory access rights Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:22 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-19 18:46 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2006-05-19 19:36 ` Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 20:07 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-19 18:25 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-05-22 11:27 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] nfs: Support vector I/O throughout the NFS direct I/O path Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=446E1287.4070200@citi.umich.edu \
--to=cel@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cel@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.