From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4471EB2C.5050402@domain.hid> Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 18:47:40 +0200 From: Philippe Gerum MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: Xenomai v2.2-rc2. PowerPC 405GPr board does not start up References: <446F852B.7090400@domain.hid> <4471DB7E.9000402@domain.hid> <200605221808.38756.niklaus.giger@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <200605221808.38756.niklaus.giger@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: niklaus.giger@domain.hid Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Niklaus Giger wrote: > Am Montag, 22. Mai 2006 17:40 schrieb Philippe Gerum: > >>Niklaus Giger wrote: >> >>>Hi everybody >>> >>>Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> >>>>Here is the second release candidate for the v2.2 branch. Short log >>>>follows: > > <...> > >>Could you try building all skins as modules with only the nucleus >>statically built into the kernel? I'd like to know whether the lockup >>occurs when one of the skin attempts to initialize, or if the problem is >>in the early Xenomai bootstrap. TIA, > > Okay. With the following .config XENOMAI settings my target starts up without > any problem till the login: > Does the board still boot with only the native skin enabled statically? If it does not, wild guess: does the following patch prevent the lockup in the latter case? --- pod.c~ 2006-05-15 15:03:52.000000000 +0200 +++ pod.c 2006-05-22 18:45:21.000000000 +0200 @@ -509,12 +509,14 @@ xnarch_notify_ready(); +#if 0 err = xnpod_reset_timer(); if (err) { xnpod_shutdown(XNPOD_FATAL_EXIT); return err; } +#endif return 0; } -- Philippe.