From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Local clone/fetch with cogito is glacial Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 14:18:07 -0700 Message-ID: <44722A8F.9020609@zytor.com> References: <4470FC21.6010104@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 22 23:19:08 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiHnp-0001ot-C1 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 23:19:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751194AbWEVVSx (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 17:18:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751197AbWEVVSw (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 17:18:52 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([192.83.249.54]:61576 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750852AbWEVVSv (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 17:18:51 -0400 Received: from [192.168.10.106] (63-207-7-10.ded.pacbell.net [63.207.7.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4MLI70b003693 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 May 2006 14:18:44 -0700 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) To: Sean In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.2, clamav-milter version 0.88.2 on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Sean wrote: > On Sun, 21 May 2006 16:47:45 -0700 > "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > >> It appears that doing a *local* -- meaning using a file path or file URL >> -- clone or fetch with cogito is just glacial when the repository has an >> even moderate number of tags (and it's fetching the tags that takes all >> the time.) That's a really serious problem for me. >> > > Peter, does git clone work acceptably for you? > Well, it does, except it doesn't set up the cogito branches (which one can of course copy manually.) cg-clone probably should be rewritten as a thin wrapper around git-clone. -hpa