Re: Local clone/fetch with cogito is glacial

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

Petr Baudis wrote:
> 
> What about incremental fetches using git-fetch? From a quick scan of the
> git-fetch automagic tags following code, it seems to be even
> significantly more expensive than Cogito's (in terms of number of
> forks).
> 

Well, I haven't used git-fetch, so I can't comment on that one.

> git-clone has an advantage here since it clones _everything_ while
> Cogito fetches only stuff related to the branch you are cloning, and
> verifying if what it fetches is sensible for you unfortunately takes a
> lot of time. :/ I guess there is no way to verify presence of multiple
> objects at once and there is also no way to order local fetch of
> multiple objects at once.

Note that non-local cg-clones are at least an order of magnitude faster, even when the 
nonlocal is just git+ssh:.  One could presumably do the same thing over a pipe.

	-hpa