All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jfaslist <jfaslist@yahoo.fr>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Maple: killing a  process that causes a machine check exception
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 18:09:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <447333BF.6060306@yahoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060523151541.GB10468@krispykreme>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed, Size: 1259 bytes --]

Hi,
What do you mean by synchronous? Do you mean that the current process 
may no be not the one that caused the ME?
In my case I _need_ the process to be killed, as it is making a VME bus 
error. / PCI target-abort.
I am starting to get desperate. I have been working for several month 
with IBM to get a solution on machine check related issues on the Maple. 
First, the Maple was hanging hard. Now that this is fixed, I need the 
Linux ME to kill the offending process!
My feeling now, is that I am really starting to have it w/ the ppc64!

-jfs

Anton Blanchard wrote:

>>By  applying the following mods (plse see below), i was able to have a 
>>user process that caused a machine check exception to be terminated (on 
>>a Maple platform), as expected. I was wondering why the PPC64 had a 
>>different ME handling than PPC which does send the SIGBUS to the process?
>>    
>>
>
>Not all machine checks are synchronous so we cant always do this. From
>memory the ppc64 version will panic if the machine check wasnt
>synchronous.
>
>Anton
>
>  
>

	

	
		
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface révolutionnaire.
http://fr.mail.yahoo.com

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-23 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-23 14:59 Maple: killing a process that causes a machine check exception jfaslist
2006-05-23 15:15 ` Anton Blanchard
2006-05-23 16:09   ` jfaslist [this message]
2006-05-23 16:23     ` Anton Blanchard
2006-05-23 16:30       ` jfaslist
2006-05-23 16:48       ` Linas Vepstas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=447333BF.6060306@yahoo.fr \
    --to=jfaslist@yahoo.fr \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.