From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.17-rc5-git1: regression: resume from suspend(RAM) fails: libata issue Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 18:29:08 -0400 Message-ID: <4478D2B4.2000500@rtr.ca> References: <1148634262.2310.7.camel@forrest26.sh.intel.com> <200605271423.40037.liml@rtr.ca> <200605272245.30108.axboe@suse.de> <4478BD60.40806@garzik.org> <20060527211157.GA31275@suse.de> <4478C1DD.2030204@garzik.org> <20060527212011.GA31551@suse.de> <4478CD4E.4000506@rtr.ca> <20060527221131.GA364@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rtr.ca ([64.26.128.89]:55760 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964960AbWE0W3K (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 May 2006 18:29:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jens Axboe , Jeff Garzik , "zhao, forrest" , Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sun, 28 May 2006, Jens Axboe wrote: >> Works for me too, I changed the delay to match the 200000 above just to >> be on the safe side. > > That's insane. That was _not_ what I expected. That wasn't actually > supposed to fix anything at all for somebody who had problems. The newly added ata_wait_idle() call waits on both BUSY and DRQ, so perhaps the wait on DRQ was what "fixed" it this time for Jens? -ml